bertie
Olympic Poster
Much Loved...
Posts: 999
|
Post by bertie on Aug 9, 2005 15:18:27 GMT 1
Seriously need to look at getting the youngster a treeless saddle, but other than Heather Moffets and Ansur (which I wouldn't buy out of principle), does anyone know of any other makers? I'm looking for (probably) a VSD - something that I will be able to show in, and possibly do a tiny bit of jumping (nothing over 2'3"). I'll also be taking part in some local riding club dressage comps. I really like the Ideal Ramsey for saddle shape - and no treeless seem to match up to that sort of flap shape!!! Help please
|
|
anon
Grand Prix Poster
Posts: 1,014
|
Post by anon on Aug 9, 2005 15:55:31 GMT 1
there isnt another one
|
|
|
Post by Hanchen on Aug 9, 2005 15:57:33 GMT 1
kay humphries? (if i have spelt that right!)
|
|
|
Post by bertie1 on Aug 9, 2005 16:15:17 GMT 1
Anyone know Kay's web site addy? Can't seem to find one on a google search
|
|
|
Post by Hanchen on Aug 9, 2005 16:20:16 GMT 1
|
|
anon
Grand Prix Poster
Posts: 1,014
|
Post by anon on Aug 9, 2005 18:06:33 GMT 1
£1800 each though!
Bit more than the Fhoenix
|
|
jinglejoys
Grand Prix Poster
Grand Prix Poster
Posts: 3,503
|
Post by jinglejoys on Aug 9, 2005 19:29:18 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Cameo on Aug 9, 2005 19:39:44 GMT 1
Ansur answers all your questions. You can jump up to 3'6" in it and it doesn't look too different to a traditional saddle.
|
|
|
Post by Yann on Aug 9, 2005 20:25:16 GMT 1
Looks like the legal action has cost another potential sale. Unfortunately people don't like what happened. I've been lucky enough to see some KH treeless saddles in the flesh as it were and have to say that they look absolutely gorgeous and totally 'normal'. Tragic that they're so expensive though
|
|
|
Post by Cameo on Aug 9, 2005 20:39:49 GMT 1
A shame that people let the legal action influence them when what really went on is not a public matter and only one side of the story has been publiciesd - and there ARE two! The point about the saddle still stands though.
|
|
|
Post by Yann on Aug 9, 2005 21:21:55 GMT 1
I don't think it is, principles are important Most of us will have no idea about the detail of what went on but for the average interested horse owner the preposterous patent and the fact that they've had the choice of buying the SBS taken away are clear enough, and very much in the public domain. Nothing wrong with buying a second hand Ansur though ;D
|
|
|
Post by Cameo on Aug 9, 2005 21:47:10 GMT 1
Principles are very important - but there really ARE two sides to this and the patent system has quie alot of influence in what went on - I obviously can't say more (and wouldn't as it isn't my business!) but I don't think we shoudl judge too harshly when most people only have seen/read about one side of the story - just wouldn't be truthful to fairness.
Still a good saddle for what Bertie wants though! Horse is the important one! Hopefully Bertie, you find what is right for you and your horse.
|
|
bayhorse
Intermediate Poster
IH Member
Posts: 217
|
Post by bayhorse on Aug 9, 2005 22:25:23 GMT 1
Well only one side of the story has been publicised because no information has been forthcoming from the other.
I wanted to get an SBS for myself and my horse, it was my saddle of choice - but I had that choice taken away from me by this ridiculous lawsuit. I now have a Fhoenix and love it, and thank goodness Heather had the determination to produce a saddle which will be even more successful than the SBS.
It has a fairly straight cut flap, and you could easily jump 3' in it.
|
|
|
Post by wendyihts on Aug 9, 2005 22:59:55 GMT 1
The patent system didn't force Ansur to take Heather Simpson to court, did it? I don't own either an Ansur or a HS saddle, BTW but it's a shame not to have a choice.
|
|
|
Post by Yann on Aug 9, 2005 23:06:19 GMT 1
Wendy, you did mean Heather Moffett didn't you? Unless of course Ansur have a patent on positive reinforcement as well
|
|